[2603.22651] Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Architectures for Financial Document Processing: A Comparative Study of Orchestration Patterns, Cost-Accuracy Tradeoffs and Production Scaling Strategies

[2603.22651] Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Architectures for Financial Document Processing: A Comparative Study of Orchestration Patterns, Cost-Accuracy Tradeoffs and Production Scaling Strategies

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.22651: Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Architectures for Financial Document Processing: A Comparative Study of Orchestration Patterns, Cost-Accuracy Tradeoffs and Production Scaling Strategies

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.22651 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Mar 2026] Title:Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Architectures for Financial Document Processing: A Comparative Study of Orchestration Patterns, Cost-Accuracy Tradeoffs and Production Scaling Strategies Authors:Siddhant Kulkarni, Yukta Kulkarni View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Architectures for Financial Document Processing: A Comparative Study of Orchestration Patterns, Cost-Accuracy Tradeoffs and Production Scaling Strategies, by Siddhant Kulkarni and Yukta Kulkarni View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The adoption of large language models (LLMs) for structured information extraction from financial documents has accelerated rapidly, yet production deployments face fundamental architectural decisions with limited empirical guidance. We present a systematic benchmark comparing four multi-agent orchestration architectures: sequential pipeline, parallel fan-out with merge, hierarchical supervisor-worker and reflexive self-correcting loop. These are evaluated across five frontier and open-weight LLMs on a corpus of 10,000 SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q and 8-K forms). Our evaluation spans 25 extraction field types covering governance structures, executive compensation and financial metrics, measured along five axes: field-level F1, document-level accuracy, end-to-end latency, cost per document and token efficiency. We find that reflexive architectures achieve the highest field-l...

Originally published on March 25, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Llms

[R] GPT-5.4-mini regressed 22pp on vanilla prompting vs GPT-5-mini. Nobody noticed because benchmarks don't test this. Recursive Language Models solved it.

GPT-5.4-mini produces shorter, terser outputs by default. Vanilla accuracy dropped from 69.5% to 47.2% across 12 tasks (1,800 evals). The...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source CLI that auto generates AI setup files for your projects just hit 150 stars

hey everyone, been working on this side project called ai-setup and just hit a milestone i wanted to share 150 github stars, 90 PRs merge...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source tool that auto generates AI context files for any codebase, 150 stars in

one of the most tedious parts of working with AI coding tools is having to manually write context files every single time. CLAUDE.md, .cu...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.
Llms

Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.

Gemini Drops is our regular monthly update on how to get the most out of the Gemini app.

AI Tools & Products · 1 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime