[2603.23114] Between Rules and Reality: On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment
About this article
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.23114: Between Rules and Reality: On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.23114 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Mar 2026] Title:Between Rules and Reality: On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment Authors:Adrian Sauter, Mona Schirmer View a PDF of the paper titled Between Rules and Reality: On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment, by Adrian Sauter and 1 other authors View PDF Abstract:A human's moral decision depends heavily on the context. Yet research on LLM morality has largely studied fixed scenarios. We address this gap by introducing Contextual MoralChoice, a dataset of moral dilemmas with systematic contextual variations known from moral psychology to shift human judgment: consequentialist, emotional, and relational. Evaluating 22 LLMs, we find that nearly all models are context-sensitive, shifting their judgments toward rule-violating behavior. Comparing with a human survey, we find that models and humans are most triggered by different contextual variations, and that a model aligned with human judgments in the base case is not necessarily aligned in its contextual sensitivity. This raises the question of controlling contextual sensitivity, which we address with an activation steering approach that can reliably increase or decrease a model's contextual sensitivity. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2603.23114 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2603.23114v1 [cs.A...