[2602.20151] Conformal Risk Control for Non-Monotonic Losses

[2602.20151] Conformal Risk Control for Non-Monotonic Losses

arXiv - Machine Learning 3 min read Article

Summary

This article presents a novel approach to conformal risk control for non-monotonic losses, extending traditional methods to multidimensional parameters and offering applications in various fields such as image classification and recidivism prediction.

Why It Matters

The research addresses limitations in existing risk control methods by providing guarantees for non-monotonic losses, which are common in real-world applications. This advancement can enhance decision-making processes in critical areas like healthcare and criminal justice, where accurate predictions are essential.

Key Takeaways

  • Introduces conformal risk control for non-monotonic losses.
  • Provides stability-based guarantees for algorithms in multidimensional contexts.
  • Demonstrates applications in selective image classification and recidivism predictions.

Statistics > Methodology arXiv:2602.20151 (stat) [Submitted on 23 Feb 2026] Title:Conformal Risk Control for Non-Monotonic Losses Authors:Anastasios N. Angelopoulos View a PDF of the paper titled Conformal Risk Control for Non-Monotonic Losses, by Anastasios N. Angelopoulos View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Conformal risk control is an extension of conformal prediction for controlling risk functions beyond miscoverage. The original algorithm controls the expected value of a loss that is monotonic in a one-dimensional parameter. Here, we present risk control guarantees for generic algorithms applied to possibly non-monotonic losses with multidimensional parameters. The guarantees depend on the stability of the algorithm -- unstable algorithms have looser guarantees. We give applications of this technique to selective image classification, FDR and IOU control of tumor segmentations, and multigroup debiasing of recidivism predictions across overlapping race and sex groups using empirical risk minimization. Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML) Cite as: arXiv:2602.20151 [stat.ME]   (or arXiv:2602.20151v1 [stat.ME] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.20151 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Anastasios Angelopoulos [view email] [v1] Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:58:54 UTC (523 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of th...

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[D] ICML 2026 Average Score

Hi all, I’m curious about the current review dynamics for ICML 2026, especially after the rebuttal phase. For those who are reviewers (or...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Apple’s best product in its first 50 years | The Verge
Nlp

Apple’s best product in its first 50 years | The Verge

From the Macintosh to the iPhone to the iMac to the iPod, it’s hard to pick a best Apple product ever. But we tried to do so anyway.

The Verge - AI · 4 min ·
Nlp

[D] Is lossy compression acceptable for conversational agent memory? Every system today uses knowledge graph triples — here's why I think that's wrong.

Been thinking about this and want to know if others have hit the same issue. The dominant approach for agent memory (Mem0, Zep, most RAG ...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
[2601.11016] Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization with Causal and Continuous Structure: An Interpretable and Tractable Approach
Nlp

[2601.11016] Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization with Causal and Continuous Structure: An Interpretable and Tractable Approach

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.11016: Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization with Causal and Continuous Structure: An Interp...

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
More in Nlp: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime