Copilot is ‘for entertainment purposes only,’ according to Microsoft’s terms of use | TechCrunch

Copilot is ‘for entertainment purposes only,’ according to Microsoft’s terms of use | TechCrunch

TechCrunch - AI 3 min read

About this article

AI skeptics aren’t the only ones warning users not to unthinkingly trust models’ outputs — that’s what the AI companies say themselves in their terms of service.

In Brief Posted: 11:51 AM PDT · April 5, 2026 Image Credits:Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket / Getty Images Anthony Ha Copilot is ‘for entertainment purposes only,’ according to Microsoft’s terms of use AI skeptics aren’t the only ones warning users not to unthinkingly trust models’ outputs — that’s what the AI companies say themselves in their terms of service. Take Microsoft, which is currently focused on getting corporate customers to pay for Copilot. But it’s also been getting dinged on social media over Copilot’s terms of use, which appear to have been last updated on October 24, 2025. “Copilot is for entertainment purposes only,” the company warned. “It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.” A Microsoft spokesperson told PCMag that the company will be updating what they described as “legacy language.” “As the product has evolved, that language is no longer reflective of how Copilot is used today and will be altered with our next update,” the spokesperson said. Tom’s Hardware noted that Microsoft isn’t the only company using this kind of disclaimer for AI.  For example, both OpenAI and xAI caution users that they should not rely on their output as “the truth” (to quote xAI) or as “a sole service of truth or factual information” (OpenAI). Topics AI, Copilot, Microsoft April 30 San Francisco, CA StrictlyVC kicks off the year in SF. Get in the room for unfiltered fireside chats...

Originally published on April 05, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[R] Architecture Determines Optimization: Deriving Weight Updates from Network Topology (seeking arXiv endorsement - cs.LG)

Abstract: We derive neural network weight updates from first principles without assuming gradient descent or a specific loss function. St...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[P] ML project (XGBoost + Databricks + MLflow) — how to talk about “production issues” in interviews?

Hey all, I recently built an end-to-end fraud detection project using a large banking dataset: Trained an XGBoost model Used Databricks f...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[D] The memory chip market lost tens of billions over a paper this community would have understood in 10 minutes

TurboQuant was teased recently and tens of billions gone from memory chip market in 48 hours but anyone in this community who read the pa...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[P] Fused MoE Dispatch in Pure Triton: Beating CUDA-Optimized Megablocks at Inference Batch Sizes

I built a fused MoE dispatch kernel in pure Triton that handles the full forward pass for Mixture-of-Experts models. No CUDA, no vendor-s...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime