[2604.03772] Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding

[2604.03772] Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding

arXiv - Machine Learning 3 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2604.03772: Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding

Statistics > Machine Learning arXiv:2604.03772 (stat) [Submitted on 4 Apr 2026] Title:Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding Authors:Keith Barnatchez, Kevin P. Josey, Rachel C. Nethery, Giovanni Parmigiani View a PDF of the paper titled Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding, by Keith Barnatchez and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Data-driven decision making frequently relies on predicting counterfactual outcomes. In practice, researchers commonly train counterfactual prediction models on a source dataset to inform decisions on a possibly separate target population. Conformal prediction has arisen as a popular method for producing assumption-lean prediction intervals for counterfactual outcomes that would arise under different treatment decisions in the target population of interest. However, existing methods require that every confounding factor of the treatment-outcome relationship used for training on the source data is additionally measured in the target population, risking miscoverage if important confounders are unmeasured in the target population. In this paper, we introduce a computationally efficient debiased machine learning framework that allows for valid prediction intervals when only a subset of confounders is measured in the target population, a common challenge referred to as runtime confounding. Grounded in ...

Originally published on April 07, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2603.12365] Optimal Experimental Design for Reliable Learning of History-Dependent Constitutive Laws
Machine Learning

[2603.12365] Optimal Experimental Design for Reliable Learning of History-Dependent Constitutive Laws

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.12365: Optimal Experimental Design for Reliable Learning of History-Dependent Constitutive Laws

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2603.17573] HeiSD: Hybrid Speculative Decoding for Embodied Vision-Language-Action Models with Kinematic Awareness
Machine Learning

[2603.17573] HeiSD: Hybrid Speculative Decoding for Embodied Vision-Language-Action Models with Kinematic Awareness

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.17573: HeiSD: Hybrid Speculative Decoding for Embodied Vision-Language-Action Models with Kinematic Aw...

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2512.20562] Shallow Neural Networks Learn Low-Degree Spherical Polynomials with Feature Learning by Learnable Channel Attention
Machine Learning

[2512.20562] Shallow Neural Networks Learn Low-Degree Spherical Polynomials with Feature Learning by Learnable Channel Attention

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.20562: Shallow Neural Networks Learn Low-Degree Spherical Polynomials with Feature Learning by Learnab...

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2603.07475] A Comparative analysis of Layer-wise Representational Capacity in AR and Diffusion LLMs
Llms

[2603.07475] A Comparative analysis of Layer-wise Representational Capacity in AR and Diffusion LLMs

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.07475: A Comparative analysis of Layer-wise Representational Capacity in AR and Diffusion LLMs

arXiv - Machine Learning · 3 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime