[2603.19840] Explainable cluster analysis: a bagging approach
Nlp

[2603.19840] Explainable cluster analysis: a bagging approach

arXiv - Machine Learning 3 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.19840: Explainable cluster analysis: a bagging approach

Statistics > Machine Learning arXiv:2603.19840 (stat) [Submitted on 20 Mar 2026] Title:Explainable cluster analysis: a bagging approach Authors:Federico Maria Quetti, Elena Ballante, Silvia Figini, Paolo Giudici View a PDF of the paper titled Explainable cluster analysis: a bagging approach, by Federico Maria Quetti and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:A major limitation of clustering approaches is their lack of explainability: methods rarely provide insight into which features drive the grouping of similar observations. To address this limitation, we propose an ensemble-based clustering framework that integrates bagging and feature dropout to generate feature importance scores, in analogy with feature importance mechanisms in supervised random forests. By leveraging multiple bootstrap resampling schemes and aggregating the resulting partitions, the method improves stability and robustness of the cluster definition, particularly in small-sample or noisy settings. Feature importance is assessed through an information-theoretic approach: at each step, the mutual information between each feature and the estimated cluster labels is computed and weighted by a measure of clustering validity to emphasize well-formed partitions, before being aggregated into a final score. The method outputs both a consensus partition and a corresponding measure of feature importance, enabling a unified interpretation of clustering structure and variable relevance. Its effectiv...

Originally published on March 23, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?
Llms

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13227: Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2601.22440] AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations
Llms

[2601.22440] AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.22440: AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Value...

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2601.13222] Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Nlp

[2601.13222] Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13222: Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2512.01707] StreamGaze: Gaze-Guided Temporal Reasoning and Proactive Understanding in Streaming Videos
Llms

[2512.01707] StreamGaze: Gaze-Guided Temporal Reasoning and Proactive Understanding in Streaming Videos

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.01707: StreamGaze: Gaze-Guided Temporal Reasoning and Proactive Understanding in Streaming Videos

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Nlp: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime