[2603.03970] Generative AI in Managerial Decision-Making: Redefining Boundaries through Ambiguity Resolution and Sycophancy Analysis
About this article
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.03970: Generative AI in Managerial Decision-Making: Redefining Boundaries through Ambiguity Resolution and Sycophancy Analysis
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.03970 (cs) [Submitted on 4 Mar 2026] Title:Generative AI in Managerial Decision-Making: Redefining Boundaries through Ambiguity Resolution and Sycophancy Analysis Authors:Sule Ozturk Birim, Fabrizio Marozzo, Yigit Kazancoglu View a PDF of the paper titled Generative AI in Managerial Decision-Making: Redefining Boundaries through Ambiguity Resolution and Sycophancy Analysis, by Sule Ozturk Birim and 2 other authors View PDF Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into complex business workflows, fundamentally shifting the boundaries of managerial decision-making. However, the reliability of its strategic advice in ambiguous business contexts remains a critical knowledge gap. This study addresses this by comparing various models on ambiguity detection, evaluating how a systematic resolution process enhances response quality, and investigating their sycophantic behavior when presented with flawed directives. Using a novel four-dimensional business ambiguity taxonomy, we conducted a human-in-the-loop experiment across strategic, tactical, and operational scenarios. The resulting decisions were assessed with an "LLM-as-a-judge" framework on criteria including agreement, actionability, justification quality, and constraint adherence. Results reveal distinct performance capabilities. While models excel in detecting internal contradictions and contextual ambiguities, they struggle with struc...