[2602.21569] How many asymmetric communities are there in multi-layer directed networks?

[2602.21569] How many asymmetric communities are there in multi-layer directed networks?

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read Article

Summary

This paper explores the estimation of asymmetric community numbers in multi-layer directed networks, introducing a novel goodness-of-fit test and sequential testing procedure to identify sender and receiver community structures.

Why It Matters

Understanding asymmetric communities in multi-layer directed networks is crucial for various applications in network analysis, social sciences, and data science. This research provides a robust statistical framework that enhances the accuracy of community detection, which can lead to better insights in complex systems.

Key Takeaways

  • Introduces a novel goodness-of-fit test for community detection.
  • Proposes a sequential testing procedure for estimating community numbers.
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of the method under the multi-layer stochastic co-block model.

Mathematics > Statistics Theory arXiv:2602.21569 (math) [Submitted on 25 Feb 2026] Title:How many asymmetric communities are there in multi-layer directed networks? Authors:Huan Qing View a PDF of the paper titled How many asymmetric communities are there in multi-layer directed networks?, by Huan Qing View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Estimating the asymmetric numbers of communities in multi-layer directed networks is a challenging problem due to the multi-layer structures and inherent directional asymmetry, leading to possibly different numbers of sender and receiver communities. This work addresses this issue under the multi-layer stochastic co-block model, a model for multi-layer directed networks with distinct community structures in sending and receiving sides, by proposing a novel goodness-of-fit test. The test statistic relies on the deviation of the largest singular value of an aggregated normalized residual matrix from the constant 2. The test statistic exhibits a sharp dichotomy: Under the null hypothesis of correct model specification, its upper bound converges to zero with high probability; under underfitting, the test statistic itself diverges to infinity. With this property, we develop a sequential testing procedure that searches through candidate pairs of sender and receiver community numbers in a lexicographic order. The process stops at the smallest such pair where the test statistic drops below a decaying threshold. For robustness, we also propose a ...

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[P] Looking for people who have had training runs fail unexpectedly to beta test a stability monitor. Free, takes 5 minutes to add to your existing loop. DM me.

Anyone actively training models want to try a stability monitor on a real run? Trying to get real world validation outside my own benchma...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

Is the Mirage Effect a bug, or is it Geometric Reconstruction in action? A framework for why VLMs perform better "hallucinating" than guessing, and what that may tell us about what's really inside these models

Last week, a team from Stanford and UCSF (Asadi, O'Sullivan, Fei-Fei Li, Euan Ashley et al.) dropped two companion papers. The first, MAR...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Yupp shuts down after raising $33M from a16z crypto's Chris Dixon | TechCrunch
Machine Learning

Yupp shuts down after raising $33M from a16z crypto's Chris Dixon | TechCrunch

Less than a year after launching, with checks from some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley, crowdsourced AI model feedback startup Yu...

TechCrunch - AI · 4 min ·
Machine Learning

[R] Fine-tuning services report

If you have some data and want to train or run a small custom model but don't have powerful enough hardware for training, fine-tuning ser...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime