How to generate text: using different decoding methods for language generation with Transformers

How to generate text: using different decoding methods for language generation with Transformers

Hugging Face Blog 17 min read

About this article

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

Back to Articles How to generate text: using different decoding methods for language generation with Transformers Published March 1, 2020 Update on GitHub Upvote 287 +281 Patrick von Platen patrickvonplaten Follow Note: Edited on July 2023 with up-to-date references and examples. Introduction In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in open-ended language generation thanks to the rise of large transformer-based language models trained on millions of webpages, including OpenAI's ChatGPT and Meta's LLaMA. The results on conditioned open-ended language generation are impressive, having shown to generalize to new tasks, handle code, or take non-text data as input. Besides the improved transformer architecture and massive unsupervised training data, better decoding methods have also played an important role. This blog post gives a brief overview of different decoding strategies and more importantly shows how you can implement them with very little effort using the popular transformers library! All of the following functionalities can be used for auto-regressive language generation (here a refresher). In short, auto-regressive language generation is based on the assumption that the probability distribution of a word sequence can be decomposed into the product of conditional next word distributions: P(w1:T∣W0)=∏t=1TP(wt∣w1:t−1,W0) ,with w1:0=∅, P(w_{1:T} | W_0 ) = \prod_{t=1}^T P(w_{t} | w_{1: t-1}, W_0) \text{ ,with } w_{1: 0} = \emptyset, P(w1:T​∣W0​)=t=1∏T​P(wt​∣...

Originally published on February 15, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2603.25112] Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory
Llms

[2603.25112] Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.25112: Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2603.24772] Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Validated Dataset
Llms

[2603.24772] Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Validated Dataset

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.24772: Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Val...

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2603.25325] How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models
Llms

[2603.25325] How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.25325: How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
Liberate your OpenClaw
Open Source Ai

Liberate your OpenClaw

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

Hugging Face Blog · 3 min ·
More in Open Source Ai: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime