[2503.07199] How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run?

[2503.07199] How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run?

arXiv - Machine Learning 3 min read Article

Summary

This article explores the efficacy of one-run auditing in differential privacy, highlighting its potential to improve the auditing process for machine learning algorithms while addressing the challenges posed by data interference.

Why It Matters

As machine learning increasingly integrates into sensitive applications, ensuring privacy through effective auditing methods is crucial. This research advances the understanding of one-run auditing, potentially leading to more reliable privacy assessments and better protection of user data in AI systems.

Key Takeaways

  • One-run auditing can efficiently assess the privacy of machine learning algorithms.
  • Interference between data elements poses a significant challenge to auditing efficacy.
  • New conceptual approaches are proposed to minimize interference and improve auditing performance.

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2503.07199 (cs) [Submitted on 10 Mar 2025 (v1), last revised 20 Feb 2026 (this version, v4)] Title:How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run? Authors:Amit Keinan, Moshe Shenfeld, Katrina Ligett View a PDF of the paper titled How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run?, by Amit Keinan and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Recent methods for auditing the privacy of machine learning algorithms have improved computational efficiency by simultaneously intervening on multiple training examples in a single training run. Steinke et al. (2024) prove that one-run auditing indeed lower bounds the true privacy parameter of the audited algorithm, and give impressive empirical results. Their work leaves open the question of how precisely one-run auditing can uncover the true privacy parameter of an algorithm, and how that precision depends on the audited algorithm. In this work, we characterize the maximum achievable efficacy of one-run auditing and show that the key barrier to its efficacy is interference between the observable effects of different data elements. We present new conceptual approaches to minimize this barrier, towards improving the performance of one-run auditing of real machine learning algorithms. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2503.07199 [cs.LG]   (or arXiv:2503.07199v4 [cs.LG] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv...

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[D] ML researcher looking to switch to a product company.

Hey, I am an AI researcher currently working in a deep tech company as a data scientist. Prior to this, I was doing my PhD. My current ro...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

Building behavioural response models of public figures using Brain scan data (Predict their next move using psychological modelling) [P]

Hey guys, I’m the same creator of Netryx V2, the geolocation tool. I’ve been working on something new called COGNEX. It learns how a pers...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[P] bitnet-edge: Ternary-weight CNNs ({-1,0,+1}) on MNIST and CIFAR-10, deployed to ESP32-S3 with zero multiplications

I built a pipeline that takes ternary-quantized CNNs from PyTorch training all the way to bare-metal inference on an ESP32-S3 microcontro...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[D] What surprised us while collecting training data from the public web been pulling training data from public web

been pulling training data from public web sources for a bit now. needed it to scale, not return complete garbage, and not immediately bl...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime