[2603.19461] Hyperagents
Nlp

[2603.19461] Hyperagents

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.19461: Hyperagents

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.19461 (cs) [Submitted on 19 Mar 2026] Title:Hyperagents Authors:Jenny Zhang, Bingchen Zhao, Wannan Yang, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, Minqi Jiang, Sam Devlin, Tatiana Shavrina View a PDF of the paper titled Hyperagents, by Jenny Zhang and 7 other authors View PDF Abstract:Self-improving AI systems aim to reduce reliance on human engineering by learning to improve their own learning and problem-solving processes. Existing approaches to self-improvement rely on fixed, handcrafted meta-level mechanisms, fundamentally limiting how fast such systems can improve. The Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrates open-ended self-improvement in coding by repeatedly generating and evaluating self-modified variants. Because both evaluation and self-modification are coding tasks, gains in coding ability can translate into gains in self-improvement ability. However, this alignment does not generally hold beyond coding domains. We introduce \textbf{hyperagents}, self-referential agents that integrate a task agent (which solves the target task) and a meta agent (which modifies itself and the task agent) into a single editable program. Crucially, the meta-level modification procedure is itself editable, enabling metacognitive self-modification, improving not only the task-solving behavior, but also the mechanism that generates future improvements. We instantiate this framework by extending DGM to create DGM-Hyperagents (DGM-H), eliminating t...

Originally published on March 23, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?
Llms

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13227: Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2601.22440] AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations
Llms

[2601.22440] AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.22440: AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Value...

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2601.13222] Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Nlp

[2601.13222] Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13222: Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2512.01707] StreamGaze: Gaze-Guided Temporal Reasoning and Proactive Understanding in Streaming Videos
Llms

[2512.01707] StreamGaze: Gaze-Guided Temporal Reasoning and Proactive Understanding in Streaming Videos

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.01707: StreamGaze: Gaze-Guided Temporal Reasoning and Proactive Understanding in Streaming Videos

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Nlp: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime