[2603.25633] Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance?

[2603.25633] Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance?

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.25633: Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance?

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.25633 (cs) [Submitted on 26 Mar 2026] Title:Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance? Authors:Liang Zhang, Yu Fu, Xinyi Jin View a PDF of the paper titled Is Mathematical Problem-Solving Expertise in Large Language Models Associated with Assessment Performance?, by Liang Zhang and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in math education not only as problem solvers but also as assessors of learners' reasoning. However, it remains unclear whether stronger math problem-solving ability is associated with stronger step-level assessment performance. This study examines that relationship using the GSM8K and MATH subsets of PROCESSBENCH, a human-annotated benchmark for identifying the earliest erroneous step in mathematical reasoning. We evaluate two LLM-based math tutor agent settings, instantiated with GPT-4 and GPT-5, in two independent tasks on the same math problems: solving the original problem and assessing a benchmark-provided solution by predicting the earliest erroneous step. Results show a consistent within-model pattern: assessment accuracy is substantially higher on math problem items the same model solved correctly than on items it solved incorrectly, with statistically significant associations across both models and datasets. At the same time, assessment remains more difficult than di...

Originally published on March 27, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Llms

[R] GPT-5.4-mini regressed 22pp on vanilla prompting vs GPT-5-mini. Nobody noticed because benchmarks don't test this. Recursive Language Models solved it.

GPT-5.4-mini produces shorter, terser outputs by default. Vanilla accuracy dropped from 69.5% to 47.2% across 12 tasks (1,800 evals). The...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source CLI that auto generates AI setup files for your projects just hit 150 stars

hey everyone, been working on this side project called ai-setup and just hit a milestone i wanted to share 150 github stars, 90 PRs merge...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source tool that auto generates AI context files for any codebase, 150 stars in

one of the most tedious parts of working with AI coding tools is having to manually write context files every single time. CLAUDE.md, .cu...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.
Llms

Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.

Gemini Drops is our regular monthly update on how to get the most out of the Gemini app.

AI Tools & Products · 1 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime