Keep the Tokens Flowing: Lessons from 16 Open-Source RL Libraries

Keep the Tokens Flowing: Lessons from 16 Open-Source RL Libraries

Hugging Face Blog 47 min read

About this article

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

Back to Articles Keep the Tokens Flowing: Lessons from 16 Open-Source RL Libraries Published March 10, 2026 Update on GitHub Upvote 68 +62 Amine Dirhoussi aminediroHF Follow Quentin Gallouédec qgallouedec Follow Kashif Rasul kashif Follow Lewis Tunstall lewtun Follow Edward Beeching edbeeching Follow Albert Villanova del Moral albertvillanova Follow Nouamane Tazi nouamanetazi Follow Leandro von Werra lvwerra Follow Sergio Paniego sergiopaniego Follow TL;DR -- For those of you who don't have time to read 5,000 words about async RL plumbing (we get it, you have models to train): The problem: In synchronous RL (reinforcement learning) training, data generation (model inference to create data samples) dominates wall-clock time -- a single batch of 32K-token rollouts on a 32B (32-billion parameter) model can take hours, while the GPUs used for training remain idle. The solution everyone converged on: Disaggregate (separate) inference and training onto different GPU pools, connect them with a rollout buffer (temporary storage for model outputs), and transfer weights asynchronously (without waiting), so neither side waits for the other. We surveyed 16 open-source libraries that implement this pattern and compared them across 7 axes: orchestration primitives, buffer design, weight sync protocols, staleness management, partial rollout handling, LoRA support, and distributed training backends. Key findings: Ray dominates orchestration (8/16 surveyed distributed computing libraries)....

Originally published on March 10, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2603.25112] Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory
Llms

[2603.25112] Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.25112: Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2603.24772] Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Validated Dataset
Llms

[2603.24772] Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Validated Dataset

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.24772: Evaluating Fine-Tuned LLM Model For Medical Transcription With Small Low-Resource Languages Val...

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2603.25325] How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models
Llms

[2603.25325] How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.25325: How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
Llms

[D] Why evaluating only final outputs is misleading for local LLM agents

Been running local agents with Ollama + LangChain lately and noticed something kind of uncomfortable — you can get a completely correct f...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
More in Open Source Ai: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime