[2602.17978] Learning Optimal and Sample-Efficient Decision Policies with Guarantees

[2602.17978] Learning Optimal and Sample-Efficient Decision Policies with Guarantees

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read Article

Summary

This paper presents a novel approach to learning optimal and sample-efficient decision policies in reinforcement learning, addressing challenges posed by hidden confounders and improving sample efficiency in high-stakes applications.

Why It Matters

The research tackles significant barriers in reinforcement learning, particularly in high-stakes environments where traditional methods are impractical. By focusing on offline learning and the influence of hidden confounders, this work has implications for various fields, including robotics and healthcare, where decision-making must be both efficient and reliable.

Key Takeaways

  • Introduces a sample-efficient algorithm for learning from offline datasets with hidden confounders.
  • Adapts causal inference techniques to improve decision-making in reinforcement learning.
  • Demonstrates improved sample efficiency for learning high-level objectives using linear temporal logic.

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2602.17978 (cs) [Submitted on 20 Feb 2026] Title:Learning Optimal and Sample-Efficient Decision Policies with Guarantees Authors:Daqian Shao View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Optimal and Sample-Efficient Decision Policies with Guarantees, by Daqian Shao View PDF Abstract:The paradigm of decision-making has been revolutionised by reinforcement learning and deep learning. Although this has led to significant progress in domains such as robotics, healthcare, and finance, the use of RL in practice is challenging, particularly when learning decision policies in high-stakes applications that may require guarantees. Traditional RL algorithms rely on a large number of online interactions with the environment, which is problematic in scenarios where online interactions are costly, dangerous, or infeasible. However, learning from offline datasets is hindered by the presence of hidden confounders. Such confounders can cause spurious correlations in the dataset and can mislead the agent into taking suboptimal or adversarial actions. Firstly, we address the problem of learning from offline datasets in the presence of hidden confounders. We work with instrumental variables (IVs) to identify the causal effect, which is an instance of a conditional moment restrictions (CMR) problem. Inspired by double/debiased machine learning, we derive a sample-efficient algorithm for solving CMR problems with convergence and optimality guarantees, which o...

Related Articles

Machine Learning

I tried building a memory-first AI… and ended up discovering smaller models can beat larger ones

Dataset Model Acc F1 Δ vs Log Δ vs Static Avg Params Peak Params Steps Infer ms Size Banking77-20 Logistic TF-IDF 92.37% 0.9230 +0.00pp +...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Llms

[D] Howcome Muon is only being used for Transformers?

Muon has quickly been adopted in LLM training, yet we don't see it being talked about in other contexts. Searches for Muon on ConvNets tu...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[P] Run Karpathy's Autoresearch for $0.44 instead of $24 — Open-source parallel evolution pipeline on SageMaker Spot

TL;DR: I built an open-source pipeline that runs Karpathy's autoresearch on SageMaker Spot instances — 25 autonomous ML experiments for $...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Improving AI models’ ability to explain their predictions
Machine Learning

Improving AI models’ ability to explain their predictions

AI News - General · 9 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime