[2603.24883] Learning to Staff: Offline Reinforcement Learning and Fine-Tuned LLMs for Warehouse Staffing Optimization

[2603.24883] Learning to Staff: Offline Reinforcement Learning and Fine-Tuned LLMs for Warehouse Staffing Optimization

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.24883: Learning to Staff: Offline Reinforcement Learning and Fine-Tuned LLMs for Warehouse Staffing Optimization

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2603.24883 (cs) [Submitted on 25 Mar 2026] Title:Learning to Staff: Offline Reinforcement Learning and Fine-Tuned LLMs for Warehouse Staffing Optimization Authors:Kalle Kujanpää, Yuying Zhu, Kristina Klinkner, Shervin Malmasi View a PDF of the paper titled Learning to Staff: Offline Reinforcement Learning and Fine-Tuned LLMs for Warehouse Staffing Optimization, by Kalle Kujanp\"a\"a and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We investigate machine learning approaches for optimizing real-time staffing decisions in semi-automated warehouse sortation systems. Operational decision-making can be supported at different levels of abstraction, with different trade-offs. We evaluate two approaches, each in a matching simulation environment. First, we train custom Transformer-based policies using offline reinforcement learning on detailed historical state representations, achieving a 2.4% throughput improvement over historical baselines in learned simulators. In high-volume warehouse operations, improvements of this size translate to significant savings. Second, we explore LLMs operating on abstracted, human-readable state descriptions. These are a natural fit for decisions that warehouse managers make using high-level operational summaries. We systematically compare prompting techniques, automatic prompt optimization, and fine-tuning strategies. While prompting alone proves insufficient, supervised fine-tuning combined with D...

Originally published on March 27, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Llms

[R] GPT-5.4-mini regressed 22pp on vanilla prompting vs GPT-5-mini. Nobody noticed because benchmarks don't test this. Recursive Language Models solved it.

GPT-5.4-mini produces shorter, terser outputs by default. Vanilla accuracy dropped from 69.5% to 47.2% across 12 tasks (1,800 evals). The...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source CLI that auto generates AI setup files for your projects just hit 150 stars

hey everyone, been working on this side project called ai-setup and just hit a milestone i wanted to share 150 github stars, 90 PRs merge...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source tool that auto generates AI context files for any codebase, 150 stars in

one of the most tedious parts of working with AI coding tools is having to manually write context files every single time. CLAUDE.md, .cu...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.
Llms

Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.

Gemini Drops is our regular monthly update on how to get the most out of the Gemini app.

AI Tools & Products · 1 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime