[2602.19510] Less is More: Convergence Benefits of Fewer Data Weight Updates over Longer Horizon

[2602.19510] Less is More: Convergence Benefits of Fewer Data Weight Updates over Longer Horizon

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read Article

Summary

This paper explores the convergence benefits of fewer data weight updates in machine learning, demonstrating that optimal update strategies can improve model training efficiency.

Why It Matters

Understanding the dynamics of data mixing and weight updates is crucial for developing more efficient machine learning models. This research provides insights that can lead to better optimization strategies, potentially enhancing model performance and reducing computational costs.

Key Takeaways

  • Fewer data weight updates can lead to better convergence in machine learning models.
  • The optimal number of inner update steps scales logarithmically with the update budget.
  • Using a single update step can be detrimental in certain scenarios, highlighting the need for careful optimization.

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2602.19510 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Feb 2026] Title:Less is More: Convergence Benefits of Fewer Data Weight Updates over Longer Horizon Authors:Rudrajit Das, Neel Patel, Meisam Razaviyayn, Vahab Mirrokni View a PDF of the paper titled Less is More: Convergence Benefits of Fewer Data Weight Updates over Longer Horizon, by Rudrajit Das and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Data mixing--the strategic reweighting of training domains--is a critical component in training robust machine learning models. This problem is naturally formulated as a bilevel optimization task, where the outer loop optimizes domain weights to minimize validation loss, and the inner loop optimizes model parameters to minimize the weighted training loss. Classical bilevel optimization relies on hypergradients, which theoretically require the inner optimization to reach convergence. However, due to computational constraints, state-of-the-art methods use a finite, often small, number of inner update steps before updating the weights. The theoretical implications of this approximation are not well understood. In this work, we rigorously analyze the convergence behavior of data mixing with a finite number of inner steps $T$. We prove that the "greedy" practical approach of using $T=1$ can fail even in a simple quadratic example. Under a fixed parameter update budget $N$ and assuming the per-domain losses are strongly convex, we show that the optimal $...

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[P] SpeakFlow - AI Dialogue Practice Coach with GLM 5.1

Built SpeakFlow for the Z.AI Builder Series hackathon. AI dialogue practice coach that evaluates your spoken responses in real-time. Two ...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
UMKC Announces New Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence
Ai Infrastructure

UMKC Announces New Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence

UMKC announces a new Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence program aimed at addressing workforce demand for AI expertise, set to l...

AI News - General · 4 min ·
Machine Learning

[R] ICML Anonymized git repos for rebuttal

A number of the papers I'm reviewing for have submitted additional figures and code through anonymized git repos (e.g. https://anonymous....

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

[R] Reference model free behavioral discovery of AudiBench model organisms via Probe-Mediated Adaptive Auditing

Anthropic's AuditBench - 56 Llama 3.3 70B models with planted hidden behaviors - their best agent detects the behaviros 10-13% of the tim...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime