[2412.13091] LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Tests

[2412.13091] LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Tests

arXiv - AI 3 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2412.13091: LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Tests

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2412.13091 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Dec 2024 (v1), last revised 4 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Tests Authors:Jon Saad-Falcon, Rajan Vivek, William Berrios, Nandita Shankar Naik, Matija Franklin, Bertie Vidgen, Amanpreet Singh, Douwe Kiela, Shikib Mehri View a PDF of the paper titled LMUnit: Fine-grained Evaluation with Natural Language Unit Tests, by Jon Saad-Falcon and 8 other authors View PDF Abstract:As language models become integral to critical workflows, assessing their behavior remains a fundamental challenge -- human evaluation is costly and noisy, while automated metrics provide only coarse, difficult-to-interpret signals. We introduce natural language unit tests, a paradigm that decomposes response quality into explicit, testable criteria, along with a unified scoring model, LMUnit, which combines multi-objective training across preferences, direct ratings, and natural language rationales. Through controlled human studies, we show this paradigm significantly improves inter-annotator agreement and enables more effective LLM development workflows. LMUnit achieves state-of-the-art performance on evaluation benchmarks (FLASK, BigGenBench) and competitive results on RewardBench. These results validate both our proposed paradigm and scoring model, suggesting a promising path forward for language model evaluation and development. Subjects: Computation and Lang...

Originally published on March 05, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2603.16629] MLLM-based Textual Explanations for Face Comparison
Llms

[2603.16629] MLLM-based Textual Explanations for Face Comparison

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.16629: MLLM-based Textual Explanations for Face Comparison

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2603.15159] To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generation
Llms

[2603.15159] To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generation

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.15159: To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generation

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2602.08316] SWE Context Bench: A Benchmark for Context Learning in Coding
Llms

[2602.08316] SWE Context Bench: A Benchmark for Context Learning in Coding

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2602.08316: SWE Context Bench: A Benchmark for Context Learning in Coding

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?
Llms

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13227: Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime