[2603.02789] OCR or Not? Rethinking Document Information Extraction in the MLLMs Era with Real-World Large-Scale Datasets

[2603.02789] OCR or Not? Rethinking Document Information Extraction in the MLLMs Era with Real-World Large-Scale Datasets

arXiv - AI 3 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.02789: OCR or Not? Rethinking Document Information Extraction in the MLLMs Era with Real-World Large-Scale Datasets

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2603.02789 (cs) [Submitted on 3 Mar 2026] Title:OCR or Not? Rethinking Document Information Extraction in the MLLMs Era with Real-World Large-Scale Datasets Authors:Jiyuan Shen, Peiyue Yuan, Atin Ghosh, Yifan Mai, Daniel Dahlmeier View a PDF of the paper titled OCR or Not? Rethinking Document Information Extraction in the MLLMs Era with Real-World Large-Scale Datasets, by Jiyuan Shen and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) enhance the potential of natural language processing. However, their actual impact on document information extraction remains unclear. In particular, it is unclear whether an MLLM-only pipeline--while simpler--can truly match the performance of traditional OCR+MLLM setups. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale benchmarking study that evaluates various out-of-the-box MLLMs on business-document information extraction. To examine and explore failure modes, we propose an automated hierarchical error analysis framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to diagnose error patterns systematically. Our findings suggest that OCR may not be necessary for powerful MLLMs, as image-only input can achieve comparable performance to OCR-enhanced approaches. Moreover, we demonstrate that carefully designed schema, exemplars, and instructions can further enhance MLLMs performance. We hope this work can offer practical guidance and valuable insight for ad...

Originally published on March 04, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Llms

[R] GPT-5.4-mini regressed 22pp on vanilla prompting vs GPT-5-mini. Nobody noticed because benchmarks don't test this. Recursive Language Models solved it.

GPT-5.4-mini produces shorter, terser outputs by default. Vanilla accuracy dropped from 69.5% to 47.2% across 12 tasks (1,800 evals). The...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source CLI that auto generates AI setup files for your projects just hit 150 stars

hey everyone, been working on this side project called ai-setup and just hit a milestone i wanted to share 150 github stars, 90 PRs merge...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Llms

built an open source tool that auto generates AI context files for any codebase, 150 stars in

one of the most tedious parts of working with AI coding tools is having to manually write context files every single time. CLAUDE.md, .cu...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.
Llms

Find out what’s new in the Gemini app in March's Gemini Drop.

Gemini Drops is our regular monthly update on how to get the most out of the Gemini app.

AI Tools & Products · 1 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime