[2602.19964] On the Equivalence of Random Network Distillation, Deep Ensembles, and Bayesian Inference

[2602.19964] On the Equivalence of Random Network Distillation, Deep Ensembles, and Bayesian Inference

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read Article

Summary

This paper establishes theoretical connections between Random Network Distillation (RND), Deep Ensembles, and Bayesian Inference, enhancing uncertainty quantification in deep learning.

Why It Matters

Understanding the equivalence of RND, Deep Ensembles, and Bayesian Inference is crucial for improving uncertainty quantification methods in deep learning. This paper provides a theoretical foundation that could lead to more efficient and reliable models, which is essential for safe AI deployments.

Key Takeaways

  • RND's uncertainty signal is equivalent to the predictive variance of deep ensembles.
  • A specific RND target function can mirror Bayesian inference's posterior predictive distribution.
  • The findings offer a unified theoretical perspective for uncertainty quantification methods.

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2602.19964 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Feb 2026] Title:On the Equivalence of Random Network Distillation, Deep Ensembles, and Bayesian Inference Authors:Moritz A. Zanger, Yijun Wu, Pascal R. Van der Vaart, Wendelin Böhmer, Matthijs T. J. Spaan View a PDF of the paper titled On the Equivalence of Random Network Distillation, Deep Ensembles, and Bayesian Inference, by Moritz A. Zanger and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Uncertainty quantification is central to safe and efficient deployments of deep learning models, yet many computationally practical methods lack lacking rigorous theoretical motivation. Random network distillation (RND) is a lightweight technique that measures novelty via prediction errors against a fixed random target. While empirically effective, it has remained unclear what uncertainties RND measures and how its estimates relate to other approaches, e.g. Bayesian inference or deep ensembles. This paper establishes these missing theoretical connections by analyzing RND within the neural tangent kernel framework in the limit of infinite network width. Our analysis reveals two central findings in this limit: (1) The uncertainty signal from RND -- its squared self-predictive error -- is equivalent to the predictive variance of a deep ensemble. (2) By constructing a specific RND target function, we show that the RND error distribution can be made to mirror the centered posterior predictive distribution o...

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[D] ICML reviewer making up false claim in acknowledgement, what to do?

In a rebuttal acknowledgement we received, the reviewer made up a claim that our method performs worse than baselines with some hyperpara...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
UMKC Announces New Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence
Ai Infrastructure

UMKC Announces New Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence

UMKC announces a new Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence program aimed at addressing workforce demand for AI expertise, set to l...

AI News - General · 4 min ·
Machine Learning

[D] Budget Machine Learning Hardware

Looking to get into machine learning and found this video on a piece of hardware for less than £500. Is it really possible to teach auton...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

Your prompts aren’t the problem — something else is

I keep seeing people focus heavily on prompt optimization. But in practice, a lot of failures I’ve observed don’t come from the prompt it...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime