![[2509.02594] OpenAIs HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-Based Medical Assistant on Realistic Clinical Queries](https://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/arxiv-logo-fb.png){kind=logo}
[2509.02594] OpenAIs HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-Based Medical Assistant on Realistic Clinical Queries
Summary
The article evaluates OpenAI's DR. INFO, an LLM-based medical assistant, using the HealthBench benchmark to assess performance on complex clinical queries, outperforming other leading models.
Why It Matters
As AI becomes integral in healthcare, understanding the efficacy of LLMs in clinical settings is crucial. This evaluation highlights the importance of nuanced assessments beyond traditional benchmarks, ensuring AI tools can provide reliable support in high-stakes environments.
Key Takeaways
- DR. INFO achieved a HealthBench Hard score of 0.68, outperforming major LLMs.
- Traditional evaluation methods are insufficient for assessing AI in clinical scenarios.
- The study emphasizes the need for behavior-level, rubric-based evaluations in AI healthcare applications.
- Strengths of DR. INFO include communication and accuracy, with areas needing improvement in context awareness.
- The findings support the development of trustworthy AI-enabled clinical support systems.
Quantitative Biology > Quantitative Methods arXiv:2509.02594 (q-bio) [Submitted on 29 Aug 2025 (v1), last revised 17 Feb 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:OpenAIs HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-Based Medical Assistant on Realistic Clinical Queries Authors:Sandhanakrishnan Ravichandran, Shivesh Kumar, Rogerio Corga Da Silva, Miguel Romano, Reinhard Berkels, Michiel van der Heijden, Olivier Fail, Valentine Emmanuel Gnanapragasam View a PDF of the paper titled OpenAIs HealthBench in Action: Evaluating an LLM-Based Medical Assistant on Realistic Clinical Queries, by Sandhanakrishnan Ravichandran and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Evaluating large language models (LLMs) on their ability to generate high-quality, accurate, situationally aware answers to clinical questions requires going beyond conventional benchmarks to assess how these systems behave in complex, high-stakes clinical scenarios. Traditional evaluations are often limited to multiple-choice questions that fail to capture essential competencies such as contextual reasoning, contextual awareness, and uncertainty handling. To address these limitations, we evaluate our agentic RAG-based clinical support assistant, DR. INFO, using HealthBench, a rubric-driven benchmark composed of open-ended, expert-annotated health conversations. On the Hard subset of 1,000 challenging examples, DR. INFO achieves a HealthBench Hard score of 0.68, outperforming leading frontier LLMs including the GPT-5 mode...