[2603.00417] Physics-Aware Learnability: From Set-Theoretic Independence to Operational Constraints
About this article
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.00417: Physics-Aware Learnability: From Set-Theoretic Independence to Operational Constraints
Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2603.00417 (cs) [Submitted on 28 Feb 2026] Title:Physics-Aware Learnability: From Set-Theoretic Independence to Operational Constraints Authors:Jeongho Bang, Kyoungho Cho View a PDF of the paper titled Physics-Aware Learnability: From Set-Theoretic Independence to Operational Constraints, by Jeongho Bang and Kyoungho Cho View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Beyond binary classification, learnability can become a logically fragile notion: in EMX, even the class of all finite subsets of $[0,1]$ is learnable in some models of ZFC and not in others. We argue the paradox is operational. The standard definitions quantify over arbitrary set-theoretic learners that implicitly assume non-operational resources (infinite precision, unphysical data access, and non-representable outputs). We introduce physics-aware learnability (PL), which defines the learnability relative to an explicit access model -- a family of admissible physical protocols. Finite-precision coarse-graining reduces continuum EMX to a countable problem, via an exact pushforward/pullback reduction that preserves the EMX objective, making the independence example provably learnable with explicit $(\epsilon,\delta)$ sample complexity. For quantum data, admissible learners are exactly POVMs on $d$ copies, turning sample size into copy complexity and yielding Helstrom(-type) lower bounds. For finite no-signaling and quantum models, PL feasibility becomes linear or semidefinite a...