[2603.20595] Position: Multi-Agent Algorithmic Care Systems Demand Contestability for Trustworthy AI
About this article
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.20595: Position: Multi-Agent Algorithmic Care Systems Demand Contestability for Trustworthy AI
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.20595 (cs) [Submitted on 21 Mar 2026] Title:Position: Multi-Agent Algorithmic Care Systems Demand Contestability for Trustworthy AI Authors:Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen, Hélène Fournier, Piper Jackson, Makoto Itoh, Shannon Freeman, Rene Richard, Hung Cao View a PDF of the paper titled Position: Multi-Agent Algorithmic Care Systems Demand Contestability for Trustworthy AI, by Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly used in healthcare to support complex decision-making through collaboration among specialized agents. Because these systems act as collective decision-makers, they raise challenges for trust, accountability, and human oversight. Existing approaches to trustworthy AI largely rely on explainability, but explainability alone is insufficient in multi-agent settings, as it does not enable care partners to challenge or correct system outputs. To address this limitation, Contestable AI (CAI) characterizes systems that support effective human challenge throughout the decision-making lifecycle by providing transparency, structured opportunities for intervention, and mechanisms for review, correction, or override. This position paper argues that contestability is a necessary design requirement for trustworthy multi-agent algorithmic care systems. We identify key limitations in current MAS and Explainable AI (XAI) research and present a hum...