[2603.27090] RDEx-CSOP: Feasibility-Aware Reconstructed Differential Evolution with Adaptive epsilon-Constraint Ranking

[2603.27090] RDEx-CSOP: Feasibility-Aware Reconstructed Differential Evolution with Adaptive epsilon-Constraint Ranking

arXiv - AI 3 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.27090: RDEx-CSOP: Feasibility-Aware Reconstructed Differential Evolution with Adaptive epsilon-Constraint Ranking

Computer Science > Neural and Evolutionary Computing arXiv:2603.27090 (cs) [Submitted on 28 Mar 2026] Title:RDEx-CSOP: Feasibility-Aware Reconstructed Differential Evolution with Adaptive epsilon-Constraint Ranking Authors:Sichen Tao, Yifei Yang, Ruihan Zhao, Kaiyu Wang, Sicheng Liu, Shangce Gao View a PDF of the paper titled RDEx-CSOP: Feasibility-Aware Reconstructed Differential Evolution with Adaptive epsilon-Constraint Ranking, by Sichen Tao and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Constrained single-objective numerical optimisation requires both feasibility maintenance and strong objective-value convergence under limited evaluation budgets. This report documents RDEx-CSOP, a constrained differential evolution variant used in the IEEE CEC 2025 numerical optimisation competition (C06 special session). RDEx-CSOP combines success-history parameter adaptation with an exploitation-biased hybrid search and an {\epsilon}-constraint handling mechanism with a time-varying threshold. We evaluate RDEx-CSOP on the official CEC 2025 CSOP benchmark using the U-score framework (Speed, Accuracy, and Constraint categories). The results show that RDEx-CSOP achieves the highest total score and the best average rank among all released comparison algorithms, mainly through strong speed and competitive constraint-handling performance across the 28 benchmark functions. Subjects: Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2603.27...

Originally published on March 31, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Ai Safety

NHS staff resist using Palantir software. Staff reportedly cite ethics concerns, privacy worries, and doubt the platform adds much

submitted by /u/esporx [link] [comments]

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

AI assistants are optimized to seem helpful. That is not the same thing as being helpful.

RLHF trains models on human feedback. Humans rate responses they like. And it turns out humans consistently rate confident, fluent, agree...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Computer Vision

House Democrat Questions Anthropic on AI Safety After Source Code Leak

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, who is generally tough on China, just sent a letter to Anthropic questioning their decision to reduce certain safet...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
[2512.21106] Semantic Refinement with LLMs for Graph Representations
Llms

[2512.21106] Semantic Refinement with LLMs for Graph Representations

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.21106: Semantic Refinement with LLMs for Graph Representations

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
More in Ai Safety: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime