[2511.10453] Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests

[2511.10453] Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests

arXiv - AI 3 min read Article

Summary

This paper explores how large language models can better handle ambiguous requests by generating multiple interpretation-answer pairs, enhancing user experience and safety.

Why It Matters

As AI systems become more integrated into daily tasks, understanding user intent is crucial. This research addresses the challenges of ambiguity in user requests, aiming to improve interaction quality and reduce misunderstandings, which can lead to safety risks.

Key Takeaways

  • Proposes a method for generating multiple interpretations for ambiguous requests.
  • Utilizes reinforcement learning and customized reward functions for training.
  • Demonstrates higher coverage of valid answers compared to baseline methods.
  • Enhances transparency and efficiency in AI responses.
  • Supports downstream applications with structured output formats.

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2511.10453 (cs) [Submitted on 13 Nov 2025 (v1), last revised 13 Feb 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests Authors:Irina Saparina, Mirella Lapata View a PDF of the paper titled Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests, by Irina Saparina and Mirella Lapata View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models often respond to ambiguous requests by implicitly committing to one interpretation. Intent misunderstandings can frustrate users and create safety risks. To address this, we propose generating multiple interpretation-answer pairs in a single structured response to ambiguous requests. Our models are trained with reinforcement learning and customized reward functions using multiple valid answers as supervision. Experiments on conversational question answering and semantic parsing demonstrate that our method achieves higher coverage of valid answers than baseline approaches. Human evaluation confirms that predicted interpretations are highly aligned with their answers. Our approach promotes transparency with explicit interpretations, achieves efficiency by requiring only one generation step, and supports downstream applications through its structured output format. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2511.10453 [cs.CL]   (or arXiv:2511.10453v2 [cs.CL] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.10453 Focus to...

Related Articles

Llms

Attention Is All You Need, But All You Can't Afford | Hybrid Attention

Repo: https://codeberg.org/JohannaJuntos/Sisyphus I've been building a small Rust-focused language model from scratch in PyTorch. Not a f...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
The “Agony” or ChatGPT: Would You Let AI Write Your Wedding Speech?
Llms

The “Agony” or ChatGPT: Would You Let AI Write Your Wedding Speech?

AI Tools & Products · 12 min ·
Anthropic expands partnership with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation compute
Llms

Anthropic expands partnership with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation compute

AI Tools & Products · 3 min ·
How I use Claude for strategy, Gemini for research and ChatGPT for 'the grind'
Llms

How I use Claude for strategy, Gemini for research and ChatGPT for 'the grind'

AI Tools & Products · 9 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime