[2605.05216] SAT: Sequential Agent Tuning for Coordinator Free Plug and Play Multi-LLM Training with Monotonic Improvement Guarantees

[2605.05216] SAT: Sequential Agent Tuning for Coordinator Free Plug and Play Multi-LLM Training with Monotonic Improvement Guarantees

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2605.05216: SAT: Sequential Agent Tuning for Coordinator Free Plug and Play Multi-LLM Training with Monotonic Improvement Guarantees

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2605.05216 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Apr 2026] Title:SAT: Sequential Agent Tuning for Coordinator Free Plug and Play Multi-LLM Training with Monotonic Improvement Guarantees Authors:Yi Xie, Yangyang Xu, Yi Fan, Bo Liu View a PDF of the paper titled SAT: Sequential Agent Tuning for Coordinator Free Plug and Play Multi-LLM Training with Monotonic Improvement Guarantees, by Yi Xie and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) with a large number of parameters achieve strong performance but are often prohibitively expensive to deploy. Recent work explores using teams of smaller, more efficient LLMs that collectively match or even outperform a single large model. However, jointly updating multiple agents introduces compounding distribution shifts, making coordination and stability during training difficult. We address this by introducing Sequential Agent Tuning (SAT), a coordinator-free training paradigm. SAT represents the team as a factorized policy and employs block-coordinate updates over agents, enabling scalable, decentralized training without a central controller. Specifically, we develop a sequence-aware, on-policy advantage estimator that conditions on the evolving team policy, coupled with per-agent KL trust regions that isolate occupancy drift. Theoretically, this framework provides two critical guarantees. First, it ensures monotonic improvement, stabilizing the training process. Second, ...

Originally published on May 08, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Researchers asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude which jobs are most exposed to AI. The chatbots wildly diagree
Llms

Researchers asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude which jobs are most exposed to AI. The chatbots wildly diagree

A study reveals that AI models disagree on which jobs are most vulnerable to automation, highlighting the unreliability of AI-generated e...

AI Tools & Products · 4 min ·
I stopped treating ChatGPT like Google — and everything suddenly clicked
Llms

I stopped treating ChatGPT like Google — and everything suddenly clicked

I stopped using ChatGPT like Google and started treating it like a thinking partner — here’s why that simple shift made the AI dramatical...

AI Tools & Products · 8 min ·
Hackers abuse Google ads, Claude.ai chats to push Mac malware
Llms

Hackers abuse Google ads, Claude.ai chats to push Mac malware

AI Tools & Products · 6 min ·
Llms

Does Claude dream of electric gavels? A federal case with Kansas connections sets an AI precedent.

AI Tools & Products ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime