[2510.08222] Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens

[2510.08222] Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2510.08222: Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2510.08222 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 27 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens Authors:Yunlong Deng, Boyang Sun, Yan Li, Lingjing Kong, Zeyu Tang, Kun Zhang, Guangyi Chen View a PDF of the paper titled Selection, Reflection and Self-Refinement: Revisit Reasoning Tasks via a Causal Lens, by Yunlong Deng and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Due to their inherent complexity, reasoning tasks have long been regarded as rigorous benchmarks for assessing the capabilities of machine learning models, especially large language models (LLMs). Although humans can solve these tasks with ease, existing models, even after extensive pre-training and post-training at scale, still fail to perform reasoning reliably. In this paper, we revisit reasoning tasks from a causal perspective, seeking to understand their behavior in latent space and to offer insights for addressing their challenges. Specifically, we cast reasoning tasks as a selection mechanism, in which high-level logical concepts function as selection operators on the given observations, such as, identifying the correct answer in a math problem or filling the appropriate entry in Sudoku. We emphasize two key properties of this formulation that shed light on the difficulty of reasoning tasks. First, the latent space exceeds the observation space in complexity, e...

Originally published on March 30, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Llms

Is the Mirage Effect a bug, or is it Geometric Reconstruction in action? A framework for why VLMs perform better "hallucinating" than guessing, and what that may tell us about what's really inside these models

Last week, a team from Stanford and UCSF (Asadi, O'Sullivan, Fei-Fei Li, Euan Ashley et al.) dropped two companion papers. The first, MAR...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Llms

Paper Finds That Leading AI Chatbots Like ChatGPT and Claude Remain Incredibly Sycophantic, Resulting in Twisted Effects on Users

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/paper-ai-chatbots-chatgpt-claude-sycophantic Your AI chatbot isn’t neutral. Trust its advice...

Reddit - Artificial Intelligence · 1 min ·
Claude Code leak exposes a Tamagotchi-style ‘pet’ and an always-on agent | The Verge
Llms

Claude Code leak exposes a Tamagotchi-style ‘pet’ and an always-on agent | The Verge

Anthropic says “human error” resulted in a leak that exposed Claude Code’s source code. The leaked code, which has since been copied to G...

The Verge - AI · 4 min ·
You can now use ChatGPT with Apple’s CarPlay | The Verge
Llms

You can now use ChatGPT with Apple’s CarPlay | The Verge

ChatGPT is now accessible from your CarPlay dashboard if you have iOS 26.4 or newer and the latest version of the ChatGPT app.

The Verge - AI · 3 min ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime