[2510.26840] SpotIt: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Evaluation with Formal Verification

[2510.26840] SpotIt: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Evaluation with Formal Verification

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2510.26840: SpotIt: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Evaluation with Formal Verification

Computer Science > Databases arXiv:2510.26840 (cs) [Submitted on 30 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 4 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:SpotIt: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Evaluation with Formal Verification Authors:Rocky Klopfenstein, Yang He, Andrew Tremante, Yuepeng Wang, Nina Narodytska, Haoze Wu View a PDF of the paper titled SpotIt: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Evaluation with Formal Verification, by Rocky Klopfenstein and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Community-driven Text-to-SQL evaluation platforms play a pivotal role in tracking the state of the art of Text-to-SQL performance. The reliability of the evaluation process is critical for driving progress in the field. Current evaluation methods are largely test-based, which involves comparing the execution results of a generated SQL query and a human-labeled ground-truth on a static test database. Such an evaluation is optimistic, as two queries can coincidentally produce the same output on the test database while actually being different. In this work, we propose a new alternative evaluation pipeline, called SpotIt, where a formal bounded equivalence verification engine actively searches for a database that differentiates the generated and ground-truth SQL queries. We develop techniques to extend existing verifiers to support a richer SQL subset relevant to Text-to-SQL. A performance evaluation of ten Text-to-SQL methods on the high-profile BIRD dataset suggests that test-based methods can often overlook d...

Originally published on March 05, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?
Llms

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13227: Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2602.00095] EDU-CIRCUIT-HW: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Real-World University-Level STEM Student Handwritten Solutions
Llms

[2602.00095] EDU-CIRCUIT-HW: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Real-World University-Level STEM Student Handwritten Solutions

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2602.00095: EDU-CIRCUIT-HW: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Real-World University-Level STEM...

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2601.13222] Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Nlp

[2601.13222] Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13222: Incorporating Q&A Nuggets into Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2502.00262] INSIGHT: Enhancing Autonomous Driving Safety through Vision-Language Models on Context-Aware Hazard Detection and Edge Case Evaluation
Llms

[2502.00262] INSIGHT: Enhancing Autonomous Driving Safety through Vision-Language Models on Context-Aware Hazard Detection and Edge Case Evaluation

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2502.00262: INSIGHT: Enhancing Autonomous Driving Safety through Vision-Language Models on Context-Aware Ha...

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Ai Startups: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime