[2603.04532] Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks
Nlp

[2603.04532] Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks

arXiv - AI 3 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.04532: Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks

Computer Science > Information Retrieval arXiv:2603.04532 (cs) [Submitted on 4 Mar 2026] Title:Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks Authors:Nathan Kuissi, Suraj Subrahmanyan, Nandan Thakur, Jimmy Lin View a PDF of the paper titled Still Fresh? Evaluating Temporal Drift in Retrieval Benchmarks, by Nathan Kuissi and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Information retrieval (IR) benchmarks typically follow the Cranfield paradigm, relying on static and predefined corpora. However, temporal changes in technical corpora, such as API deprecations and code reorganizations, can render existing benchmarks stale. In our work, we investigate how temporal corpus drift affects FreshStack, a retrieval benchmark focused on technical domains. We examine two independent corpus snapshots of FreshStack from October 2024 and October 2025 to answer questions about LangChain. Our analysis shows that all but one query posed in 2024 remain fully supported by the 2025 corpus, as relevant documents "migrate" from LangChain to competitor repositories, such as LlamaIndex. Next, we compare the accuracy of retrieval models on both snapshots and observe only minor shifts in model rankings, with overall strong correlation of up to 0.978 Kendall $\tau$ at Recall@50. These results suggest that retrieval benchmarks re-judged with evolving temporal corpora can remain reliable for retrieval evaluation. We publicly release all our artifacts at this https URL. Subjects...

Originally published on March 06, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[P] Unix philosophy for ML pipelines: modular, swappable stages with typed contracts

We built an open-source prototype that applies Unix philosophy to retrieval pipelines. Each stage (PII redaction, chunking, dedup, embedd...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Nlp

[P] Using YouTube as a data source (lessons from building a coffee domain dataset)

I started working on a small coffee coaching app recently - something that could answer questions around brew methods, grind size, extrac...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?
Llms

[2601.13227] Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.13227: Insider Knowledge: How Much Can RAG Systems Gain from Evaluation Secrets?

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2601.22440] AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations
Llms

[2601.22440] AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversations

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.22440: AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Value...

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Nlp: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime