[2603.00076] The Value Sensitivity Gap: How Clinical Large Language Models Respond to Patient Preference Statements in Shared Decision-Making

Computer Science > Computers and Society arXiv:2603.00076 (cs) [Submitted on 12 Feb 2026] Title:The Value Sensitivity Gap: How Clinical Large Language Models Respond to Patient Preference Statements in Shared Decision-Making Authors:Sanjay Basu View a PDF of the paper titled The Value Sensitivity Gap: How Clinical Large Language Models Respond to Patient Preference Statements in Shared Decision-Making, by Sanjay Basu View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are entering clinical workflows as decision support tools, yet how they respond to explicit patient value statements -- the core content of shared decision-making -- remains unmeasured. We conducted a factorial experiment using clinical vignettes derived from 98,759 de-identified Medicaid encounter notes. We tested four LLM families (GPT-5.2, Claude 4.5 Sonnet, Gemini 3 Pro, and DeepSeek-R1) across 13 value conditions in two clinical domains, yielding 104 trials. Default value orientations differed across model families (aggressiveness range 2.0 to 3.5 on a 1-to-5 scale). Value sensitivity indices ranged from 0.13 to 0.27, and directional concordance with patient-stated preferences ranged from 0.625 to 1.0. All models acknowledged patient values in 100% of non-control trials, yet actual recommendation shifting remained modest. Decision-matrix and VIM self-report mitigations each improved directional concordance by 0.125 in a 78-trial Phase 2 evaluation. These findings provide empirical data for...