[2605.00737] To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

[2605.00737] To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2605.00737: To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.00737 (cs) [Submitted on 1 May 2026] Title:To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling Authors:Qinyuan Wu, Soumi Das, Mahsa Amani, Arijit Nag, Seungeon Lee, Krishna P. Gummadi, Abhilasha Ravichander, Muhammad Bilal Zafar View a PDF of the paper titled To Call or Not to Call: A Framework to Assess and Optimize LLM Tool Calling, by Qinyuan Wu and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Agentic AI architectures augment LLMs with external tools, unlocking strong capabilities. However, tool use is not always beneficial; some calls may be redundant or even harmful. Effective tool use, therefore, hinges on a core LLM decision: whether to call or not call a tool, when performing a task. This decision is particularly challenging for web search tools, where the benefits of external information depend on the model's internal knowledge and its ability to integrate potentially noisy tool responses. We introduce a principled framework inspired by decision-making theory to evaluate web search tool-use decisions along three key factors: necessity, utility, and affordability. Our analysis combines two complementary lenses: a normative perspective that infers true need and utility from an optimal allocation of tool calls, and a descriptive perspective that infers the model's self-perceived need and utility from their observed behaviors. We find that models' perceived need and utility of tool ...

Originally published on May 04, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Researchers asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude which jobs are most exposed to AI. The chatbots wildly diagree
Llms

Researchers asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude which jobs are most exposed to AI. The chatbots wildly diagree

A study reveals that AI models disagree on which jobs are most vulnerable to automation, highlighting the unreliability of AI-generated e...

AI Tools & Products · 4 min ·
I stopped treating ChatGPT like Google — and everything suddenly clicked
Llms

I stopped treating ChatGPT like Google — and everything suddenly clicked

I stopped using ChatGPT like Google and started treating it like a thinking partner — here’s why that simple shift made the AI dramatical...

AI Tools & Products · 8 min ·
Hackers abuse Google ads, Claude.ai chats to push Mac malware
Llms

Hackers abuse Google ads, Claude.ai chats to push Mac malware

AI Tools & Products · 6 min ·
Llms

Does Claude dream of electric gavels? A federal case with Kansas connections sets an AI precedent.

AI Tools & Products ·
More in Llms: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime