Washington needs AI guardrails — now | Opinion

Washington needs AI guardrails — now | Opinion

AI Tools & Products 3 min read

About this article

We need legislation that draws clear lines on what AI systems may and may not do on behalf of the United States government

Washington needs AI guardrails — now | OpinionWe need legislation that draws clear lines — on surveillance, on lethal autonomy, on what AI systems may and may not do on behalf of the United States governmentDavid RabjohnsMarch 27, 2026, 6:00 a.m. ETThe Pentagon reportedly threatened to blacklist AI company Anthropic for refusing to allow its technology for domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons.OpenAI subsequently signed a deal with the Pentagon that complies with existing laws, which some critics argue has loopholes.The author argues that Congress, not private companies, should create clear legislation to regulate government use of AI.Concerns are raised that current laws are outdated and may not prevent potential misuse of powerful AI technologies.The Pentagon threatened to blacklist Anthropic — the AI safety company behind Claude — for refusing to let the government use its technology for mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. A few hours later, OpenAI stepped in and signed a deal. Washington declared victory.I am not a lawyer. I am not a general. I am a retired technology entrepreneur who spent 20 years building software systems for Fortune 1000 companies, and I know what it looks like when someone signs a contract with enough wiggle room to drive a Humvee through.OpenAI's deal promises to comply with existing laws. Sounds reasonable. Except that in 2013, those same laws were on the books when the NSA was quietly collecting the phone records of ...

Originally published on March 27, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2601.12910] SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment
Ai Safety

[2601.12910] SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.12910: SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2509.21385] Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retraining
Machine Learning

[2509.21385] Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retraining

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2509.21385: Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retraining

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2512.00804] Epistemic Bias Injection: Biasing LLMs via Selective Context Retrieval
Llms

[2512.00804] Epistemic Bias Injection: Biasing LLMs via Selective Context Retrieval

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.00804: Epistemic Bias Injection: Biasing LLMs via Selective Context Retrieval

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2509.24296] DiffuGuard: How Intrinsic Safety is Lost and Found in Diffusion Large Language Models
Llms

[2509.24296] DiffuGuard: How Intrinsic Safety is Lost and Found in Diffusion Large Language Models

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2509.24296: DiffuGuard: How Intrinsic Safety is Lost and Found in Diffusion Large Language Models

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Ai Safety: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime