[2603.27792] What-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series Classification

[2603.27792] What-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series Classification

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.27792: What-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series Classification

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2603.27792 (cs) [Submitted on 29 Mar 2026] Title:What-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series Classification Authors:Udo Schlegel, Thomas Seidl View a PDF of the paper titled What-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series Classification, by Udo Schlegel and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Counterfactual explanations emerge as a powerful approach in explainable AI, providing what-if scenarios that reveal how minimal changes to an input time series can alter the model's prediction. This work presents a survey of recent algorithms for counterfactual explanations for time series classification. We review state-of-the-art methods, spanning instance-based nearest-neighbor techniques, pattern-driven algorithms, gradient-based optimization, and generative models. For each, we discuss the underlying methodology, the models and classifiers they target, and the datasets on which they are evaluated. We highlight unique challenges in generating counterfactuals for temporal data, such as maintaining temporal coherence, plausibility, and actionable interpretability, which distinguish the temporal from tabular or image domains. We analyze the strengths and limitations of existing approaches and compare their effectiveness along key dimensions (validity, proximity, sparsity, plausibility, etc.). In addition, we implemented an open-source implementation library, Counterfactual Explanations fo...

Originally published on March 31, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Improving AI models’ ability to explain their predictions
Machine Learning

Improving AI models’ ability to explain their predictions

AI News - General · 9 min ·
Machine Learning

[D] TMLR reviews seem more reliable than ICML/NeurIPS/ICLR

This year I submitted a paper to ICML for the first time. I have also experienced the review process at TMLR and ICLR. From my observatio...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[D] icml, no rebuttal ack so far..

Almost all the papers I reviewed have received at least one ack, but I haven’t gotten a single rebuttal acknowledgment yet. Is there anyo...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
UMKC Announces New Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence
Ai Infrastructure

UMKC Announces New Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence

UMKC announces a new Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence program aimed at addressing workforce demand for AI expertise, set to l...

AI News - General · 4 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime