[2604.06148] Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries
About this article
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2604.06148: Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries
Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2604.06148 (cs) [Submitted on 7 Apr 2026] Title:Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries Authors:Andrew Kurtz, Klaudia Krawiecka View a PDF of the paper titled Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries, by Andrew Kurtz and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The governance of artificial intelligence has a blind spot: the machine identities that AI systems use to act. AI agents, service accounts, API tokens, and automated workflows now outnumber human identities in enterprise environments by ratios exceeding 80 to 1, yet no integrated framework exists to govern them. A single ungoverned automated agent produced $5.4-10 billion in losses in the 2024 CrowdStrike outage; nation-state actors including Silk Typhoon and Salt Typhoon have operationalized ungoverned machine credentials as primary espionage vectors against critical infrastructure. This paper makes four original contributions. First, the AI-Identity Risk Taxonomy (AIRT): a comprehensive enumeration of 37 risk sub-categories across eight domains, each grounded in documented incidents, regulatory recognition, practitioner prevalence data, and threat intelligence. Second, the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT): an integrated six-domain governance...