[2604.06148] Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries

[2604.06148] Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries

arXiv - AI 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2604.06148: Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2604.06148 (cs) [Submitted on 7 Apr 2026] Title:Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries Authors:Andrew Kurtz, Klaudia Krawiecka View a PDF of the paper titled Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries, by Andrew Kurtz and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The governance of artificial intelligence has a blind spot: the machine identities that AI systems use to act. AI agents, service accounts, API tokens, and automated workflows now outnumber human identities in enterprise environments by ratios exceeding 80 to 1, yet no integrated framework exists to govern them. A single ungoverned automated agent produced $5.4-10 billion in losses in the 2024 CrowdStrike outage; nation-state actors including Silk Typhoon and Salt Typhoon have operationalized ungoverned machine credentials as primary espionage vectors against critical infrastructure. This paper makes four original contributions. First, the AI-Identity Risk Taxonomy (AIRT): a comprehensive enumeration of 37 risk sub-categories across eight domains, each grounded in documented incidents, regulatory recognition, practitioner prevalence data, and threat intelligence. Second, the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT): an integrated six-domain governance...

Originally published on April 08, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

[2510.14628] RLAIF-SPA: Structured AI Feedback for Semantic-Prosodic Alignment in Speech Synthesis
Ai Safety

[2510.14628] RLAIF-SPA: Structured AI Feedback for Semantic-Prosodic Alignment in Speech Synthesis

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2510.14628: RLAIF-SPA: Structured AI Feedback for Semantic-Prosodic Alignment in Speech Synthesis

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2504.05995] NativQA Framework: Enabling LLMs and VLMs with Native, Local, and Everyday Knowledge
Llms

[2504.05995] NativQA Framework: Enabling LLMs and VLMs with Native, Local, and Everyday Knowledge

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2504.05995: NativQA Framework: Enabling LLMs and VLMs with Native, Local, and Everyday Knowledge

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2502.19463] Hedging and Non-Affirmation: Quantifying LLM Alignment on Questions of Human Rights
Llms

[2502.19463] Hedging and Non-Affirmation: Quantifying LLM Alignment on Questions of Human Rights

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2502.19463: Hedging and Non-Affirmation: Quantifying LLM Alignment on Questions of Human Rights

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
[2410.20791] From Cool Demos to Production-Ready FMware: Core Challenges and a Technology Roadmap
Llms

[2410.20791] From Cool Demos to Production-Ready FMware: Core Challenges and a Technology Roadmap

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2410.20791: From Cool Demos to Production-Ready FMware: Core Challenges and a Technology Roadmap

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Ai Safety: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime