[2603.22525] Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogates

[2603.22525] Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogates

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2603.22525: Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogates

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2603.22525 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Mar 2026] Title:Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogates Authors:Samrendra Roy, Kazuma Kobayashi, Souvik Chakraborty, Rizwan-uddin, Syed Bahauddin Alam View a PDF of the paper titled Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogates, by Samrendra Roy and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Operator learning models are rapidly emerging as the predictive core of digital twins for nuclear and energy systems, promising real-time field reconstruction from sparse sensor measurements. Yet their robustness to adversarial perturbations remains uncharacterized, a critical gap for deployment in safety-critical systems. Here we show that neural operators are acutely vulnerable to extremely sparse (fewer than 1% of inputs), physically plausible perturbations that exploit their sensitivity to boundary conditions. Using gradient-free differential evolution across four operator architectures, we demonstrate that minimal modifications trigger catastrophic prediction failures, increasing relative $L_2$ error from $\sim$1.5% (validated accuracy) to 37-63% while remaining completely undetectable by standard validation metrics. Notably, 100% of successful single-point attacks pass z-score anomaly detection. We introduce the effective perturbation d...

Originally published on March 25, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Machine Learning

[P] I tested Meta’s brain-response model on posts. It predicted the Elon one almost perfectly.

I built an experimental UI and visualization layer around Meta’s open brain-response model just to see whether this stuff actually works ...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[P] I trained an AI to play Resident Evil 4 Remake using Behavioral Cloning + LSTM

I recorded gameplay trajectories in RE4's village — running, shooting, reloading, dodging — and used Behavioral Cloning to train a model ...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Machine Learning

[D] Why does it seem like open source materials on ML are incomplete? this is not enough...

Many times when I try to deeply understand a topic in machine learning — whether it's a new architecture, a quantization method, a full t...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
Llms

[R] GPT-5.4-mini regressed 22pp on vanilla prompting vs GPT-5-mini. Nobody noticed because benchmarks don't test this. Recursive Language Models solved it.

GPT-5.4-mini produces shorter, terser outputs by default. Vanilla accuracy dropped from 69.5% to 47.2% across 12 tasks (1,800 evals). The...

Reddit - Machine Learning · 1 min ·
More in Machine Learning: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime