[2512.09085] Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AI
About this article
Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.09085: Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AI
Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction arXiv:2512.09085 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Dec 2025 (v1), last revised 27 Feb 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AI Authors:Janet V.T. Pauketat, Daniel B. Shank, Aikaterina Manoli, Jacy Reese Anthis View a PDF of the paper titled Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AI, by Janet V.T. Pauketat and 3 other authors View PDF Abstract:Narratives about artificial intelligence (AI) entangle autonomy, the capacity to self-govern, with sentience, the capacity to sense and feel. AI agents that perform tasks autonomously and companions that recognize and express emotions may activate mental models of autonomy and sentience, respectively, provoking distinct reactions. To examine this possibility, we conducted three pilot studies (N = 374) and four preregistered vignette experiments describing an AI as autonomous, sentient, both, or neither (N = 2,702). Activating a mental model of sentience increased general mind perception (cognition and emotion) and moral consideration more than autonomy, but autonomy increased perceived threat more than sentience. Sentience also increased perceived autonomy more than vice versa. Based on a within-paper meta-analysis, sentience changed reactions more than autonomy on average. By disentangling different mental models of AI, we can study human-AI interaction with more precision to better navigate the detailed design of anthropomorphize...