[2510.18299] Physics-Informed Parametric Bandits for Beam Alignment in mmWave Communications

[2510.18299] Physics-Informed Parametric Bandits for Beam Alignment in mmWave Communications

arXiv - Machine Learning 4 min read

About this article

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2510.18299: Physics-Informed Parametric Bandits for Beam Alignment in mmWave Communications

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2510.18299 (cs) [Submitted on 21 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 1 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Physics-Informed Parametric Bandits for Beam Alignment in mmWave Communications Authors:Hao Qin, Thang Duong, Ming F. Li, Chicheng Zhang View a PDF of the paper titled Physics-Informed Parametric Bandits for Beam Alignment in mmWave Communications, by Hao Qin and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:In millimeter wave (mmWave) communications, beam alignment and tracking are crucial to combat the significant path loss. As scanning the entire directional space is inefficient, designing an efficient and robust method to identify the optimal beam directions is essential. Since traditional bandit algorithms require a long time horizon to converge under large beam spaces, many existing works propose efficient bandit algorithms for beam alignment by relying on unimodality or multimodality assumptions on the reward function's structure. However, such assumptions often do not hold (or cannot be strictly satisfied) in practice, which causes such algorithms to converge to choosing suboptimal beams. In this work, we propose two physics-informed bandit algorithms \textit{pretc} and \textit{prgreedy} that exploit the sparse multipath property of mmWave channels - a generic but realistic assumption - which is connected to the Phase Retrieval Bandit problem. Our algorithms treat the parameters of each path as black boxes and maintain ...

Originally published on March 03, 2026. Curated by AI News.

Related Articles

Washington needs AI guardrails — now | Opinion
Ai Safety

Washington needs AI guardrails — now | Opinion

We need legislation that draws clear lines on what AI systems may and may not do on behalf of the United States government

AI Tools & Products · 3 min ·
[2601.12910] SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment
Ai Safety

[2601.12910] SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2601.12910: SciCoQA: Quality Assurance for Scientific Paper--Code Alignment

arXiv - AI · 3 min ·
[2509.21385] Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retraining
Machine Learning

[2509.21385] Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retraining

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2509.21385: Debugging Concept Bottleneck Models through Removal and Retraining

arXiv - Machine Learning · 4 min ·
[2512.00804] Epistemic Bias Injection: Biasing LLMs via Selective Context Retrieval
Llms

[2512.00804] Epistemic Bias Injection: Biasing LLMs via Selective Context Retrieval

Abstract page for arXiv paper 2512.00804: Epistemic Bias Injection: Biasing LLMs via Selective Context Retrieval

arXiv - AI · 4 min ·
More in Ai Safety: This Week Guide Trending

No comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Stay updated with AI News

Get the latest news, tools, and insights delivered to your inbox.

Daily or weekly digest • Unsubscribe anytime